Burberry is often
labelled as the top digital luxury brand. It launched its Facebook page in 2009
and was thus one of the first luxury brands that is using social
networking. It currently has over 17
million fans on its Facebook page. The brand updates its statutes and posts
contents on daily basis and thus seeks to engage customers. Some of the
contents it posts include live streams of its runway shows, advertisements,
presentations of its products, campaigns, acoustic tracks performed and
recorded exclusively for Burberry (part of its Burberry Acoustic project),
presenting the newest collections, make-up tutorials, footages from catwalk,
behind the scenes content, important events and dates for the company, store
openings, and announcements, and so forth. This
variety of content manages to keep its fans entertained. The proof of this high
level of engagement is the number of likes, comments and shares. The number of
‘likes’ and ‘shares’ on the Burberry Facebook page can reach few thousands (see
Appendix 2).
On
the other hand, Hermes’ SMM appears to be significantly less engaging. This
brand has considerably less fans on its Facebook page and posts contents very
rarely. The last post on its Facebook fan page was on 28. June. Table 3
summarises the SMM of both brands on the basis of several variables: number of
fans, frequency of posts, and level of engagement. As shown in the table
Burberry’s SMM is significantly stronger than that of Hermes and this is also
reflected on the level of fans’ engagement.
Burberry delivers relevant, interesting and varied content that captures
not only the personality and exclusivity of the brand but the attention of the
fans as well.
The number of ‘likes’, ‘shares’ and
‘comments’ clearly acknowledges the high level of consumer engagement that
Burberry creates on its Facebook fan page. On the basis of these figures, we
can make few assumptions that will later be tested by drawing upon the data
collected with the online questionnaires. Considering that Burberry’s marketing
activities on Facebook are significantly more engaging that the marketing
activities of Hermes we can assume that Burberry’s consumer brand equity will
be much stronger than the brand equity of Hermes. More precisely, considering
that the present study conceptualises and measures the concept of brand equity
through 6 different dimensions (see Table 2) we assume that:
-
Burberry’s Facebook activities will have a
greater influence on awareness of the brand than Hermes’ activities;
-
Burberry’s Facebook activities will have greater
influence on perceived quality, value and uniqueness of the brand than Hermes’
activities;
-
Burberry’s Facebook activities will have greater
influence on brand imagery and performance related associations than Hermes’
activities;
-
Burberry’s Facebook activities will have greater
influence on evaluations of brand quality and brand consideration than Hermes’
activities;
-
Burberry’s Facebook activities are more likely
to evoke favourable emotions of social approval, self-respect and excitement
among fans than Hermes’ activities;

0 Komentar untuk "The SMM of Burberry and Hermes"